Commie Media’s Anti-Hindu Poison – Ravinar : कम्युनिस्ट मीडिया का हिन्दू विरोधी विषैला प्रचार

Beginning this post we will go through a series of articles on how the Commie MSM colludes with Congress, CPM and other similar parties to trash Hindu culture, history and divide Hindus on various lines. While not a continuation, this series will build on the previous post of “Foreigners dressed as Indians”.

The MSM hates Social Media as does the govt. They are trying everything to strangle it. The media celebs would like to enjoy the same monopoly over their truth that they have enjoyed many decades. It’s close to Diwali. You will once again hear all those noises from the queens about firecrackers and noises. The life and wealth of most of these celebs are made of being anti-Hindu culture, traditions and customs. It requires being in the “circle of trust” of the Communists who have dictated the writing of our history, our policies and also the discourse in our MSM. Make no mistake, even the TOI is and was a Commie newspaper but has for many years now become one that is more into money and not news. The Hindu, from a nationalist newspaper, has become a total Commie. Same goes for NDTV, CNN-IBN. What about the individuals? From Rajdeep to Arnab to Barkha to Vir Sanghvi to Aakar Patel to most of them; all are Commies. But they like to claim they are ‘liberals’. I call that ‘Fiberals’. This is true for our historians too. Romila Thapar, Irfan Habib and pop historian Ram Guha and their tribe.

Guha likes to call himself a “lapsed Marxist”. Guha calls Nehru “decent”. On what basis? Nobody knows because Nehru died when Guha was six. Gossip and second-hand hearsay passes for history writing. The only thing that lapses among all these people in the “circle” is something called conscience. Take Aakar Patel for instance. Two years ago hardly anyone knew about him. Suddenly, the guy is all over the place writing anti-Modi articles three times a day in 4 different newspapers. He also becomes a panellist in all the news channels. Of course, some have claimed Aakar being a Muslim but that is irrelevant to the context. Some bring their Britishness from Oxbridge or US universities and some from places like JNU. It’s easy to break into this incestuous circle if you are anti-Hindu, anti-Hindu culture and traditions. It’s a passport to wealth, fame and recognition.

If you call yourself a “Hindu nationalist” you will be denounced and pilloried as pure evil. But claim that you’re a “Muslim first” and nobody will even whisper. The Commies have long white-washed the crimes of Islamic invaders to establish Hindu society as a criminal society of upper-caste and lower-caste where the upper-castes exploited everyone else. So the Commies often argue that the Islamic invaders actually saved Hindu society and the lower-castes. Of course, the Hindus also destroyed other religions like Buddhism and Jainism as they like to frequently claim. You will hear any number of Congis and media folks even on Facebook and Twitter making such claims. Never forget the bogus Aryan invasion theory that the Westerners started and the Commies perpetuated. Now that this theory has been scientifically busted, some still cling on to it. Same is true for the bogus theories of Hindus having eaten beef since time immemorial.

Take a right-wing journalist like Swapan Dasgupta. He’s a smart guy, very intelligent and popular with everyone. SwapanD will write everything accurately but stop short of giving verifiable information and names. Of course, he is entitled to hide names. He is one guy from the other side who has learned how to successfully swim with the sharks. You know, somewhat like Arun Jaitley and Sushma Swaraj. Imagine, SD had a series of debates with the gutter-mouth Manishankar Aiyar. That’s fine, you can debate anyone. Where was this debate hosted? On NDTV; the den of Commies! What was the show called? Politically Incorrect! Is there anything about NDTV, Swapan or Aiyar that can be possibly politically incorrect? I have to seriously laugh. But if you have to be successful in the media, make fortunes and earn recognition there are some compromises you have to make. Otherwise you are bound to languish like….

After the bomb blast in Mumbai in July 2011 I wrote the post “Seema Mustafa V Subramaniam Swamy”. In this post note how cleverly and mischievously Mustafa writes about the target of the blast:

“The Hindus, he keeps insisting, are the targets. But when blasts take place in crowded market places in Mumbai or any other part of India, the targets are the people of India, Dr Swamy. Hindus and Muslims and Sikhs and Christians and Parsis and Jains and Brahmins and Dalits and all those who are at the spot die because the bomb cannot differentiate among religions and castes”.

Notice anything? You see, the victims are Hindus, Brahmins, Dalits apart from other religions. Clever, isn’t it? So Hindus are different from Brahmins and Dalits. This is the clever trick and deception that Commie media has practiced all along and still does. Not enough? Take a look at the tweet from another Commie outpost called Tehelka on the recent Muzaffarnagar riots. Oh! It’s Jats V Muslims. Jats are not Hindus. Watch closely and you will find these crooks dividing Hindus on a daily basis. Any idea who they are doing it for and what they gain from it? Make a wild guess! If you believe many of our media folks often talk like agents of Pakistan then that is only partly true. It’s not Pakistan, it’s Islam. It could have been Saudi Arabia next door and the discourse would still be the same. You see, for the Commies Islam is a secular religion and one of peace. Nothing will please the Commies more than to see India as an Islamic republic. I’m not joking. The Commies have even described Maharana Pratap and Shivaji as “rebels” against Islamic rulers and not as Hindu Kings of our proud history.

If you claim to be a Hindu Nationalist, you will be promptly labelled communal, fascist, anti-minorities and a chauvinist pig. Just listen to guys like Arvind Kejriwal, Yogendra Yadav of the new brigade. If you’re a Hindu you are essentially against the poor, the minorities, the Dalits, the Jats, the Gujjars and everyone else. Is there anyone that the Hindu isn’t against? This is what will be spun by the media and their Commie associates every single day to you. Let’s take scumbag Vir Sanghvi.

Now this Vir Sanghvi is also a cook apart from being a media steno-typist for Niira Radia. In a Q&A with students over the history of the Babri Masjid conflict this is what he told them in 2009 (Ayodhya for dummies). Here’s one of the questions:

So to defend the crimes of the Islamic invaders who destroyed temples and looted them Sanghvi tries to “balance” it by stating Hindus did the same to Buddhist temples and drove Buddhism out of India. Okay! Buddhism also disappeared in many other countries where Hinduism didn’t prevail. How does anyone explain that? Fact is this is a lie that Sanghvi and his Commie friends in the CPM and Congress have perpetrated for ages. Many continue to perpetrate this lie. Sanghvi’s nonsense has been well analysed and answered by many including Reality Check. Would Sanghvi ever accept he is wrong? No! But call him a Commie and he will surely protest. Most media folks don’t like to be called Commies, they prefer the “liberal” tag. The “Fiberals”, as I call them are Commie liars who peddle lies not only about our history but also about current affairs. They distort and spin facts to present you stories. Except that these stories don’t have a label: “Poison”.

That’s not all, this incestuous Commie club makes life difficult for any alternative thesis or questions to be published. Arun Shourie, even as a renowned journalist, had a problem publishing his first book and had to do it himself. Here’s what he writes on the question of Hindus destroying Buddhist temples or institutions in “Eminent Historians”:

“Describing the massacres of the latter and the destruction of their vihars, universities, places of worship, the author writes, “The Musalman invaders sacked the Buddhist Universities of Nalanda, Vikramshila, Jagaddala, Odantapuri to name only a few. They raised to the ground Buddhist monasteries with which the country was studded. The monks fled away in thousands to Nepal, Tibet and other places outside India. A very large number were killed outright by the Muslim commanders. How the Buddhist priesthood perished by the sword of the Muslim invaders has been recorded by the Muslim historians themselves. Summarizing the evidence relating to the slaughter of the Buddhist Monks perpetrated by the Musalman General in the course of his invasion of Bihar in 1197 AD, Mr. Vincent Smith says, “….Great quantities of plunder were obtained, and the slaughter of the ‘shaven headed Brahmans’, that is to say the Buddhist monks, was so thoroughly completed, that when the victor sought for someone capable of explaining the contents of the books in the libraries of the monasteries, not a living man could be found who was able to read them. ‘It was discovered,’ we are told, ‘that the whole of that fortress and city was a college, and in the Hindi tongue they call a college Bihar.’ “Such was the slaughter of the Buddhist priesthood perpetrated by the Islamic invaders. The axe was struck at the very root. For by killing the Buddhist priesthood, Islam killed Buddhism. This was the greatest disaster that befell the religion of the Buddha in India….”

And who exactly is Arun Shourie quoting? The above part is quoted from BR Ambedkar’s writings. Ambedkar who converted to Buddhism should know a lot more about Buddhist history than Commies like Sanghvi and others of his club.

The Commies have not only conspired to destroy our history but have peddled lies about it. A majority of media houses who scream non-stop every single day are employed in this grand design of telling you that Hindus are communal, a danger to India and are anti-Muslims. With the arrival of SM it has become more and more difficult for them to hide the lies and distort facts. They won’t give up. Be careful what you consume. I have labelled them “Poison”. We shall see more of these lies in the forthcoming parts in this series.

In 1976, African-American Alex Haley published “Roots: The Saga of an American Family”, a novel based on his family’s history, starting with the story of Kunta Kinte, who was kidnapped in the Gambia in 1767 and transported to Maryland to be sold as a slave. Haley claimed to be a seventh-generation descendant of Kunta Kinte. He went to the village of Juffure, where Kunta Kinte grew up and which is still in existence, and listened to a tribal historian tell the story of Kinte’s capture. Haley also traced the records of the ship, The Lord Ligonier, which he said carried his ancestor to America. Haley has stated that the most emotional moment of his life occurred on September 29, 1967, when he stood at the site in Annapolis, Maryland where his ancestor had arrived from Africa in chains exactly 200 years before. A memorial depicting Haley reading a story to young children gathered at his feet has since been erected in the center of Annapolis. The official page of Haley’s book notes:

“Alex Haley’s Roots is the monumental two-century drama of Kunta Kinte and the six generations who came after him. By tracing back his own roots, Haley tells the story of 39 million Americans of African descent. He has rediscovered for an entire people a rich cultural heritage that ultimately speaks to all races everywhere, for the story it tells is one of the most eloquent testimonials ever written to the indomitability of the human spirit”.

Haley’s memorial has him reading a story to young children. What would he have told them about his history? What would he have told them that they could learn from his? History is written not because we would like to change it. We obviously cannot. History is written so that we discover and learn the truth about our past and who we were and why we are the way we are. And in learning those truths we hope to undertake a better journey than the one in the past and retain the best from what our ancestors left us. The “indomitability of the human spirit” equally applies to Hindus and the other natives of this land (Sikhs, Jains, Buddhists etc). It is probably the only race of people and culture that murderous invaders couldn’t wipe out. That’s half the story. But when you have crooks who constantly distort and lie about history and have been doing so unchecked then your future is likely to be just as distorted and painful. That is how India got here. That is what the Commies were and are doing, as is the MSM that is infested with them. Nothing would please the Commies and the Congis (and DMK types) for the Hindu identity to completely disappear. Their consistent actions have proved that they would rather have Yadavs, Brahmins, Rajputs, Ezhavas, Dalits, Jats, Gujjars, Harijans, OBCs, Tribals etc. as identities rather than anything that is remotely called “Hindu”.

In the introduction to my book “Social Media as watchdog” I wrote: “One of the biggest challenges for students coming out of schools and colleges in India is not remembering what they learnt but unlearning what they did. This is particularly true of history courses. Much of our history taught in schools cannot exactly be described as accurate. Designed as they were by left-leaning historians, the courses use an abundant dose of imagination and distortion. Thus, students have to learn true history and facts only outside of schools. The same experience is true for the whole population when they encounter Mainstream Media”.

Till after the 2007 elections in Gujarat I had no idea what caste or tribe Narendra Modi was from. I didn’t know YSR Reddy, the late Andhra CM, was a Christian. Frankly, I couldn’t have cared less. Guess who educated me? It was NDTV, CNN-IBN and other similar channels that ran bios of Modi and educated me that he was an OBC, a Ghanchi (supposedly the Barber clan). Was there any purpose to it? His victory hurt Barkha Dutt so much that she tagged all Gujjus as “effete” people. Such tagging is one of the most important features of the Commies. Anyone that challenges their incestuous circle will be tagged with unthinkable names and adjectives even if that person is holding evidence of unshakeable truth. Lavrentiy Beria, Security Head under Stalin is credited with the line “You bring me the man, I’ll find you the crime”. To put it more bluntly, I love the James Hadley Chase title: “You find him, I’ll fix him”. They will negate everything about a person or an organisation. They will manufacture crimes. RSS runs “Bomb-making” factories! Ring a bell? Here’s something I’ve written before:

Negationism is defined as denial or distortion of historical facts, especially those relating to crimes against humanity. Dr. Koenrad Elst, a Belgian, is a Hinduism scholar who has written much about this negationism and concealing of Islamic record in India. Here’s what Elst has to say (Wiki): Historians of the Aligarh school (e.g. Irfan Habib) or Indian Marxists (e.g. Romila Thapar) have resorted to history-rewriting: “Therefore, in 1982 the National Council of Educational Research and Training (NCERT) issued a directive for the rewriting of schoolbooks. Among other things, it stipulated that: “Characterization of the medieval period as a time of conflict between Hindus and Muslims is forbidden.” Under Marxist pressure, negationism has become India’s official policy”. It actually recommends dumbing down of students. Effectively, it meant the horrors of Indian Islamic history must be hidden from our students. Students who cared were able to get to the real history but our MSM still follows that diktat. So is it a surprise that Muslim violence is covered up and mostly turned into ‘victimhood’ or an Anti-Hindu rant? Did such a “cleansing” really happen? Well, here are facts produced by Arun Shourie in Eminent Historians:

Under the CPM govt in Bengal a circular dated 28 April, 1989 is issued by the West Bengal Secondary Board. It is in Bengali, and carries the number “Syl/89/1” (For Class-9. Here “Aushuddho” supposedly means “impure” and “Shuddho” is “cleanse” by alteration or by deletion)

Book : Bharatvarsher Itihash, by Dr. Narendranath Bhattacharya, published by Chakravarty & Son:

Page 89 : Aushuddho – “Sultan Mahmud used force for widespread murder, loot, destruction and conversion.”

Shuddho – “There was widespread loot and destruction by Mahmud.” That is, no reference to killing, no reference to forcible conversions.

Page 89 : Aushuddho – “He looted valuables worth 2 crore dirham from the Somnath temple and used the Shivling as a step leading up to the masjid in Ghazni.”

Shuddho – “Delete ‘and used the Shivling as a step leading up to the masjid in Ghazni.'”

Page 112 : Aushuddho — “Hindu-Muslim relations of the medieval ages is a very sensitive issue. The non- believers had to embrace Islam or death.”

Shuddho — All matter on pages 112-13 to be deleted.

Page 113 : Aushuddho – “According to Islamic law non-Muslims will have to choose between death and Islam. Only the Hanafis allow non-Muslims to pay jaziya in exchange for their lives.”

Shuddho – Rewrite this as follows : “By paying jaziya to Allauddin Khilji, Hindus could lead normal lives.” Moreover, all the subsequent sentences “Qazi…”, “Taimur’s arrival in India…” to be deleted.

Page 113 : Aushuddho – “Mahmud was a believer in the rule of Islam whose core was ‘Either Islam or death’.

Shuddho — Delete.

Mind you, what I provided above is just a sample. You can go through the whole set of “cleansing” that the CPM’s education board ordered at this page. What’s the logic behind such cleansing other than killing history? If at all there is some belief that kids may not be able to absorb such a violent history, which is not a stated objective, then it’s better to choose a higher age when they can be taught this rather than giving them half-truths. In reality, when kids discover the truth at a later age they hold in contempt the schools which taught them bogus history when it was neither the fault of the school nor the teachers. The danger is, someday some Indian kid might grow up to write a book like the one some American has written.

The root of any good or bad ideological practice is usually found in the precedents set by the founding fathers of a nation. India doesn’t really have founding fathers except her Hindu culture. But post-independence some like to give that honour to some people. MK Gandhi was called the Father of the nation. Jawaharlal Nehru is often referred to as the ‘Architect of modern India’. In his book on Negationism, Koenrad Elst recalls Nehru’s admiration for Mahmud Ghaznavi

The best-known propounder of negationism was certainly Jawarharlal Nehru… his writings contain some crude cases of glorification of Muslim tyrants and concealment or denial of their crimes. Witness his assessment of Mahmud Ghaznavi, who, according to his chronicler Utbi, sang the praise of the temple complex at Mathura and then immediately proceeded to destroy it. Nehru writes: “Building interested Mahmud, and he was much impressed by the city of Mathura near Delhi”. About this he wrote: “There are here a thousand edifices as firm as the faith of the faithful; nor is it likely that this city has attained its present condition but at the expense of many millions of dinars, nor could such another be constructed under a period of 200 years.” And that is all: Nehru described the destroyer of Mathura as an admirer of Mathura, apparently without noticing the gory sarcasm in Ghaznavi’s eulogy. Moreover, Nehru denied that Mahmud had committed his acts of destruction out of any religious motive: “Mahmud was not a religious man. He was a Mohammedan, but that was just by the way. He was in the first place a soldier, and a brilliant soldier.”

You will hear the same nonsense that for much of the killings and brutality religion was not a motive. They would like us to believe that the crazy guys just wanted to demonstrate their martial skills. But MK Gandhi set the example of covering up and white-washing such crimes. The Moplah murderers of Kerala and the Khilafat movement ended up killing thousands of Hindus but what did MKG think about it? Here’s what:

“The Moplah revolt is a test for Hindus and Mussulmans. Can Hindus friendship survive the strain put upon it? Can Mussulmans in the deepest recesses of their hearts approve of the conduct of the Moplahs?…. The Hindus must have the courage and the faith to feel that they can protect their religion in spite of such fanatical eruptions…. The Mussulmans must naturally feel the shame and humiliation of the Moplah conduct about forcible conversions and looting, and they must work away so silently and effectively that such things might become impossible even on the part of the most fanatical among them. My belief is that the Hindus as a body have received the Moplah madness with equanimity and that the cultured Mussulmans are sincerely sorry for the Moplah’s perversion of the teachings of the Prophet.”

The article I linked goes on to ask of Gandhi: He fails to state the extent of Hindu losses once again. He believes that ‘Hindus have received Moplah madness with equanimity’. How can you receive acts like ‘rape’, ‘murder’, ‘forcible conversions’ etc with ‘equanimity’? He states that cultured Mussulmans are sincerely sorry for the acts. But our question is this: Did he find out why this revolt was so inhuman and why it was committed in the name of religion? Did he try to understand the Moplah point of view? Did he find out why the anti-British agitation turned into ‘anti-Hindu’? The answer to all these questions is a resounding ‘NO’.

In Kerala we had a CPM politician openly declaring political murder was a natural practice of the party. MM Mani just gets suspended for six months when he should have been in jail. What about the killings under the CPM itself in Bengal? Here’s an interesting read that is fairly reliable given the violent and criminal nature of Commie politics:

55000? That’s like one “Gujarat 2002” for every year of CPM in Bengal, isn’t it? But which one gets the most noise in our media? To avoid interpreting selectively I recommend reading the full story which is even more damning. Did you ever see such an important story being discussed in any news channel or newspaper? Did you see a debate anywhere? Stupid channels spend hours discussing a stray comment of some Cleric called Madani but never in the last 20 years has any channel discussed the crimes of the Commies. Why? Because they ARE the Commies! In quite a similar fashion our media also “cleanses” the violence of Muslims whether it’s Deganga or over the 100 riots in UP. They report it only when it becomes absolutely inevitable. The Muzaffarnagar riots wouldn’t have been on air if not for a reporter being killed. And for every single incident everywhere else the “Big Bindis” of the Commies come out crying and wailing. If they can cleanse history from our schools they can also cleanse the truth from our news media. No matter what happens, stick the “Convict” badge on the Hindu. No matter what the terrorist act or killing, find the Hindu and they will find his crime. Are sympathies of NDTV, CNN-IBN to the murderous Commies a lot clearer? Is it also any surprise why NDTV loves separatists? Lord Macaulay had a dream of creating English speaking interpreters and intellects and most of them are the current day Commies.

Call Malini Parthasarthy a Commie and she will be very offended. Most liars in the media don’t like to be called Commies. They prefer the more stylish “fiberal” tag. Her silly tweet is factually wrong but it still helps to explain why you are a worthless piece of junk if you don’t speak English. The toiling villagers and many Indians who can just speak their own dialect is a nuisance in their lives. Educate yourselves on their expectations! If you think Lord Macaulay didn’t finish his job then I have good news for you. He wanted a nation so steeped in the English language and belief that Indians think very lowly of themselves. Macaulay may have been buried in history but his dreams are alive. At the very least Macaulay could admit that the backbone of India is her spiritual and cultural heritage. What Macaulay couldn’t finish off, the Commies, their historians and their counterparts in our MSM are desperately trying to finish off. Stick a post-it on your TV screens or papers when you watch or read them: “Shuddho: Poison”.

The Catch-22 of Salma and Sabrina!

What we say is the truth. What you’ve got is fiction. Period! You can bring all the proofs in the world. Trash! You can pile a mountain of evidence. Trash! Salma says it, Sabrina corroborates it. That’s what counts. If Salma doesn’t get you, Sabrina will.

Strategic Forecasting Inc. (Stratfor) is a global strategic intelligence forecast company. What do they do? Err… They’re somewhat like the weatherman; the IMD, who forecast cyclones, sunny weather, rains and gloom. Stratfor does the same in the domain of geo-politics, economics, emerging markets and so on. But they aren’t limited to that as this Wikileaks release tells us:

Stratfor also appears to share information with CIA and other similar bodies. That must be their revenue model. Who is their contact or points-man in India? The self-righteous Shekhar Gupta, reveals Wikileaks. If everything about Stratfor was above board why is it that no bio of ShekharG ever reveals his connection with them? The concern about Stratfor in this post is basically what they wrote recently in an article called “India’s tryst with destiny”. The article is about the upcoming general elections and how it might dramatically alter India’s future course. Nothing very unusual really, except this part:

Most readers would miss the trickery but nestled in the middle of a lot of words are LIES that have been discredited over and over again and an “intelligence” outfit like Stratfor is writing this in 2013. The concoction of 2000 Muslims killed and 400 rapes is the handiwork of many Commies like Teesta Setalvad, Arundhati Roy, Shabnam Hashmi, Javed Akhtar, CPM, Congress and, of course, champion liars like NDTV and CNN-IBN and other channels. I would call it a “collective community” effort. Sometimes there have been panellists who have quoted figures of anywhere between 2000 and 5000 and our news anchors have allowed such nonsense to pass in the garb of “balanced debate”. The number of people who have enriched themselves and amassed huge wealth over the dead bodies of Gujarat will be difficult to count.

Simple truth is, some Commie group starts off with the lie and all others play the jungle drums tom-toming and before you know it, it’s massive propaganda that takes a very long time to dispel. Sometimes almost impossible to dispel! It’s like “Nero fiddled…” when actually the fiddle wasn’t invented till 500 years after Nero’s death. It’s like Hindi is the only “national language” when it is not. It’s like Nehru was a “total democrat” when most of his actions prove to the contrary. It’s like Congress “respects courts” when it’s the only party that consistently negated Court decisions or completely disrespected it.

Imagine this: If I were to ask Stratfor where they got the 2000 and 400 number from I guess they’d tell me “from The Hindu”. Ask The Hindu they’d say from NDTV. Ask NDTV they’d say from Teesta. Ask Teesta she’ll say from Shabnam Hashmi. Ask Shabbo she’ll say from Genocide Suzy. Ask Suzy she’ll say from Barkha Dutt. Ask Barkha she’ll say from Rajdeep Sardesai. Ask Rajdeep he will say it was in The Hindu report. Ask The Hindu… Oops! There, your cycle is complete! There isn’t one single authentic valid source for the figures. It’s like Sagarika Ghose saying the Dilkush Nagar blasts in Hyderabad were in an area full of meat shops. Ask Sagarika’s friend where she got this piece of information; she’ll say “I read it in Sagarika’s tweet”. This is an incestuous club that quotes each other’s lies with no authentic figures from any source. There’s no escape. It wasn’t very different in the on-going Ram Janmabhoomi case.

Read this examination of the Allahabad HC judgement on RJB by Prof. R.Vaidyanathan. When confronted with the fact that none of the “eminent distortians” really had any evidence of the property having been a mosque from the start they all make you laugh with what they quote as evidence (excerpts): “Suvira Jaiswal says: “Whatever knowledge I gained with respect to the disputed site is based on newspaper reports or what others told.” She also confessed that she “prepared a report on the Babri dispute after reading newspaper reports and on the basis of discussion with my medieval history expert in my department”… Archaeologist Shereen Ratnagar admitted she did not have any “field” experience as far as Babri was concerned and had written an “introduction” to the book of another “expert” who deposed before the court, namely Prof D Mandal… Suraj Bhan was providing evidence based on medieval history but another expert of Muslim parties, namely Shireen Musavi, says that Bhan is an archeologists and not a historian”.

It gets hilarious as you go along. But it’s no laughing matter. This is how the Commies consistently spread lies without reliable, authentic data and conveniently distort the truth. If you challenge them they will resort to ad hominem attacks (like the moron who told Smriti Irani she was a TV show dancer) which have nothing to do with the topic of the debate. Do read the whole article of Prof. Vaidyanathan so you understand how Commies spread lies and claim evidence based on nothing but each other’s ass. So it goes on and on. The other aspect of the Commie media which I have repeatedly emphasised is ‘LIE BIG, retract small’. Most people will remember the Swami Nityananda case where he has been accused of raping, molestation and some more. Whatever the charges, someday a court will deliver the verdict. So let’s leave that part to the courts. But using soft-porn, channels Aaj Tak of the India Today group and Star Vijay grandly carried a fake video of an actress in compromising positions with Nityananda and aired it over and over again. A complaint to the Broadcasting Content Complaints Council got an investigation going and established the actress’s image was morphed. India Today issued an apology in September 2013.

The image of India Today’s apology is on the left (you may have to enlarge it to read the whole text). You can also read the directions given by the BCCC to StarVijay. The BCCC notes: “Firstly, it is clear that the channel did not exercise any caution whatsoever in telecasting the said episode without confirming the authenticity of the clippings… Further, even the contention of the channel that the said Programme was telecast for creating awareness amongst public is to be believed, then where was the need for constantly making references to the complainant and also repeatedly showing her completely unconnected videos from public life?” Well, I will tell you what the BCCC won’t tell you about the need to telecast the fake video and the need to tar the complainant. It is simply because the issue was connected to a man wearing “saffron”. If the video had actually been genuine but had it been connected to a Mullah or a Christian priest, nobody would have ever heard of the video. The length to which the Commie channels will go to tar someone in “saffron” is by now well established. Anything that moves in saffron is game for them.

The other thing is to air the fake video a million times at prime time and then merely apologise in scrolls at odd hours of off-peak viewership. LIE BIG, retract small. The character-assassination will be seen by a million people but the apology would be seen only by the observant ones. This is a regular feature of criminal Commie anti-Hindu poison. These aren’t stray instances either. I doubt anyone has forgotten the classic case of “Sack Sagarika” where she and her crooks in CNN-IBN tried to tar SriSri Ravishankar in a manipulated “fake live” programme and later claimed it was a “bug”. Not just that, she even had the audacity to claim later that people were slamming her on this account because she is a woman. Commit a crime, play victim.

Here’s another trick. When things start going badly for the Commies they will put out something from history, ancient or of 50 years ago, and throw it at you to confound you. The southern bastion of Commie writings “The Hindu” suddenly pulled up the issue of RSS being bailed out by the Nehru govt suggesting it was on certain pre-conditions. What exactly is the context or relevance? Nothing! Varadabhai’s objective is simple: Put “a Spaniard in the works” and create a distraction which has some people talking about it. Why suddenly RSS? Because parties opposed to BJP claim Modi’s choice as PM candidate was dictated by RSS. Oh let’s not forget RSS works to protect Hindu interests so it is obviously “EVIL”. Let’s agree; anything Hindu is evil! So, to the campaign that has already been tarring Modi for over a decade let’s add another one. Let’s tar and discredit RSS, again. So cobble together some nonsense from history and peddle it.

That’s what some Vidya Subrahmaniam of The Hindu did recently. The simple premise of what VidyaS is saying is that a ban on RSS was removed (ban was after MK Gandhi’s killing) because they undertook to remain out of politics and to write a Constitution for their organisation. And because they had given such an undertaking, according to VidyaS, they have broken that promise in 2013 by backing Modi as PM candidate or politicking to get him there. Whatever her mighty grievance is.

Alright, so S. Gurumurthy is allowed to write a rebuttal in The Hindu where he asserts that the lifting on the ban was “unconditional”. (Links to both articles are available in Gurumurthy’s response). There was no reason for VidyaS to raise muck. For the simple fact is that as of now RSS is free to enter politics. RSS is also free to alter its Constitution the way it wants as long as it is within the law. That should have legally been the position always. That’s what matters. So Gurumurthy writes: “In a written statement to the Bombay Legislative Assembly on September 14, 1949 (Proceedings p2126) the Home Minister Morarji Desai admitted that the ban on RSS was no longer considered necessary; it was lifted unconditionally; and the RSS gave no undertaking. If no undertaking was indeed given in 1949, where is the question of reneging on it in 2013”? If indeed it is asserted by Morarji Desai, as Home Minister, and recorded in the proceedings then that would be an authentic record. But that’s where Salma and Sabrina come in again.

Annoyed that her mindless raking up of a currently inconsequential issue to tar RSS and Modi has met with a strong rebuttal, VidyaS then puts up evidence that back her claims. This evidence is to prove that the RSS ban was indeed lifted on certain pre-conditions set by Sardar Patel and the Nehru govt (readhere). For the benefit of all mankind here is the evidence she presents:

I believe if you read the evidence VidyaS has provided you’ll be convinced about her claims. There’s just one problem; this is Salma quoting Sabrina. You see, this is what the Commies practice as providing evidence. Even Tehelka has started a unique practice. Tehelka interviews their editor Shoma Chaudhury and reports her quotes as headlines. Shoma interviews her sidekick Rana Ayyub and Tehelka reports it as headlines. Rana Ayyub quotes her own article and Tehelka reports it as news. Voila! Salma and Sabrina do it all by themselves without any help. Stratfor did it. The RJB commies did it. So VidyaS too does a Salma by quoting clippings from her own Sabrina (The Hindu) as evidence for her claims. Much as this matter itself is absolutely irrelevant for the present times, even in such a case the Commie quotes itself as solid evidence. Basic journalistic propriety requires that you quote at least one third party or an official gazette or govt record as evidence. Nothing!

It’s like I call you a thief and you ask me for evidence. And what’s the evidence? I point you to my blog dated February 31, 2010 where I have called you a thief earlier. So you refer to my blog of February 31 and ask for evidence for that charge. I tell you it’s an old charge which hasn’t been disproved (even if I never provided evidence the first time around). There’s no escape. It’s the problem Capt. John Yossarian faces in “Catch-22”. He is sick and desperate to get out of the foreign airbase. The only way one can do it is by establishing he is mentally crazy and insane but there’s a catch. This is best demonstrated by this little conversation between Yossarian and Doc Dhaneeka from the famous story and movie:

Yossarian: Is Orr crazy?

Doc Daneeka: Of course he is. He has to be crazy to keep flying after all his close calls he’s had.

Yossarian: Why can’t you ground him?

Doc Daneeka: I can, but first he has to ask me.

Yossarian: That’s all he’s gotta do to be grounded?

Doc Daneeka: That’s all.

Yossarian: Then you can ground him?

Doc Daneeka: No. Then I cannot ground him.

Yossarian: Aah!

Doc Daneeka: There’s a CATCH!

Yossarian: A catch?

Doc Daneeka: Sure. Catch-22. Anyone who wants to get out of combat isn’t really crazy, so I can’t ground him.

Yossarian: Ok, let me see if I’ve got this straight. In order to be grounded, I’ve got to be crazy. And I must be crazy to keep flying. But if I ask to be grounded, that means I’m not crazy anymore, and I have to keep flying.

Doc Daneeka: You got it, that’s Catch-22.

Yossarian: Whoo… That’s some catch, that Catch-22.

Doc Daneeka: It’s the best there is.

So you can present all the evidence in the world but it’s not acceptable. They present the words and quotes from each other and that constitutes evidence. If the right hook doesn’t get you the left one will. If Salma doesn’t get you, Sabrina will.

One of the tricks that commies like Yogendra Yadav, Suzy Roy and Ram Guha use is to hammer in new phrases like “Idea of India” that have little truth and even lesser relevance to discussions. Their idea is that India didn’t exist historically but was cobbled together by the British or by political leaders after Independence. Many years ago an applicant wrote a hilarious essay in an IAS exam on the “Indian cow”. Fortunately, he stopped short of saying India is a cow. Unfortunately, he also passed the exam. Fortunately, we do have a wizard who also finds India is a beehive, a computer, a river, and a bouquet and you never know what he might turn India into next. Unfortunately, there are media morons who recognise this as Rahul Gandhi’s “vision for India”. Frankly, in that essay only one cow was tortured. With this wizard an entire country is likely to be tortured.

Someone sidekicks must have realised that RG simply doesn’t have the knowledge to talk sense so it is best he talks silly stuff and emotional stuff. It’s somewhat like Amitabh Bachchan in Deewar who has never been to a temple and when he finally goes there he doesn’t know how to pray except lash out. So lately the RG story is more about “my mummy, my daddy, my grandmother, my grandfather, my great-grandfather” and even mosquitoes. Err… correction; the grandfather never appears in the story. This is then laced with great anger against everyone and everything and how you can’t eat roads and airports. How else do you explain this absolute moronery that RG delivers repeatedly and unfailingly?

Even by his stupid logic, if airports cannot feed people at least they get used. What are the chances an Agni missile will be used in the next 10 years? Why make them? The media then discusses this man not for the joke he is but whether he will be the next PM when every editor in every TV channel and newspaper should be declaring him a confirmed disaster. But what do the media end up discussing? Whether RG has changed the agenda to “Secular Vs Communal”!  You can’t eat airports and roads, but for the Congress it seems the poor can surely eat secularism. That is the typical Commie trickery. In the absence of any real performance or plan that the Commies can offer turn the discussion in to mindless nonsense and the media will drum up the fears of communal violence where there isn’t any. There are slavish idiots like Kumar Ketkar who actually felt RG’s “mosquito and ISI contacting Muslims in Muzzafarnagar” was a diplomatic statement (on CNN-IBN). No wonder even Sagarika Ghose is getting awards.

The question that even observant writers ask is how is it that the Commies who numbered about 60 odd in the previous parliament and about 40 odd in the current parliament dictate the national agenda so much with empty rhetoric. This is because they refuse to recognise the Congress as the biggest Communist party in India. Is it any surprise that CPM, CPI and other Commies always support them? It is not stooges of CPM who have infested institutions like JNU and many other govt funded bodies. It is the Congress that has been infesting them with commies. And like a mafia-wife the media carries out their agenda through propaganda and fear-mongering. Muslims are good, Christians are good, Buddhists are good, Hindus are communal villains. How did this commie nonsense start? Here is something from history that should tell us how:

That sounds like a passionate speech, doesn’t it? Well, that is a part of the great-grandfather’s or Jawaharlal Nehru’s speech to the INC in 1936. Strangely, the author who is paying a tribute to Nehru has “cleansed” the speech. In other words, he has used the Commie technique of “Shuddho” in the specific part that he uses. Now here’s the para that Nehru actually used:

The full para on socialism is, naturally, quoted by the Marxist site without any “Shuddho” since it promotes their ideology. The portion underlined in blue is a very historically significant statement by Nehru. In comparison to RG, Nehru was definitely more educated and possessed better thinking skills but even back then Nehru just glossed over the mass killings in Russia with a mere “disagree with” and then says “I am convinced that, if some world catastrophe does not intervene this new civilisation will spread to other lands”. Well, catastrophe did fall upon the USSR and it now doesn’t exist. What was experienced was mass killings, extra-ordinary poverty, political unrest and even long queues for bread. That then is the foundation of the Commie ideology of the Congress which is fashionably practiced as “socialism”.

In the 55 odd years that the Congress has ruled India that flawed vision of Nehru and the continuing practices have neither resulted in “Garibi Hatao” nor education for all or food for all. Even today, the same “right to everything” is being peddled as major accomplishment rather than performance. That isn’t all; the Commie ideology has created monsters like the Maoists who want to overthrow the State through insurgency and violence. The one thing you will never hear RG or any Commie talk about is how much employment they generated or how much employment their future plans will generate (this includes disguised unemployment through schemes like NREGA). Instead, you will hear bombastic nonsense like in 5 years there will be a lot of development and your children will go to America for a better India. Where’s the account for the last 5? RG even lied that Congress built more roads than the NDA did in 5 years. His own govt has acknowledged that 50% of national roads were built under NDA in the last 30 years. Not one media channel questioned it.

A nation thrives on aspirations. The poor want to get out of their misery. They don’t want endless doles and hand-outs; they want honourable employment and the power to purchase food and their needs. They don’t want free food. China is technically a Communist country but they have undertaken more reforms in the last 3 decades than India has. They are now an economic super-power while India claiming to be a democracy still languishes. Our reserves are down and prices are killing people. The largest foreign holder of US debts is China, estimated at $1.2 Trillion. China holds $3.6 Trillion in foreign reserves. We are still struggling with an anti-reform commie model that has failed everywhere in the world. The Chinese reform story is available in many pages that can be easily found and understood. I recall NDTV screaming about FDI Retail as a “Big Bang reform”. Nothing came of it because the investors don’t trust the economic climate. Even bribery-accused Wal-Mart has backed off.

We are not only burdened with a failed Soviet ideology but the Congress also uses their old techniques to stifle dissent and opponents through dishonest means. The Emergency is a vast story by itself. But even today the misuse of CBI, the IB, the CVC etc. are indicators. The IB seems to be giving private briefings to Dr. Rahul Gandhi. Well, it seems the “Gandhi” name entitles him to anything. Brother in law Robert Vadra has extraordinary security and wealth-accumulation. For all of the problems brought about the Commies there is only one evil to blame; Hindus and Hindutva. These Hindutva forces are enemies of the nation, you see. The Commies will say it and the media folks like Arnab Goswami and Rajdeep Sardesai will rake up nonsense about the “Communal” threats. They will talk about 2002 when the worst communal riots in our history have been under the Commies (and I include Congress in Commies). The media simply won’t even touch upon 55000 people killed in Bengal under CPM (mentioned in a previous part).

In the run up to elections in five States, there will be more such anti-Hindu poison by both the Commies and the MSM. Cleverly, the MSM now uses Arvind Kejriwal’s party in debates as an “arbiter”. His party doesn’t run any govt so has nothing to its credit and no failures but he and his Commie gang can freely accuse every party of crimes. Take a look at this:

Kejriwal & gang put out that grand statement on Muzzafarnagar without the slightest evidence. When caught lying they silently deleted the page. The hunt will continue. It is not just Narendra Modi or Amit Shah. Where required, officers like PC Parakh will always be hunted as is being done in Coalgate. Ashok Khemka is being charge-sheeted because he exposed bad deals of Vadra. Not all the “angry old man” comic speeches of RahulG can change the direction. The Commies have nothing to show for performance. For the ordinary man it is a road to nowhere.

PS: In a major change at The Hindu, the management sacked Varadabhai for unhealthy editorial practices. The management says many “stories” were passed off as “news items”. Varadabhai says it was the same during N. Ram as editor. I see no reason to disagree. I see every reason why it is the same for most media outlets in the MSM.