If Religion is Opium Are Communism ,Marxism , Naxalism Not The Same – An Indian Perspective – Ramakant Tewari

इस लेख के विचार श्री रमाकांत तिवारी के निजी विचार हैं . किसी अन्य  काशी हिन्दू विश्व विद्यालय बनाने दिया .आज हम ग से गणेश की जगह ग से गधा पढ़ा कर देशभक्त व् गौरवान्वित महसूस कर रहे हैं ?

क्या भारत मैं  हिन्दूधर्म  विनाश के कगार पर नहीं है . यदि अंग्रेजों को हिन्दू धर्म से ख़तरा नहीं लगा तो आज क्यों हम इसका शिक्षा से नामों निशाँ मिटाना चाहते हैं .

क्यों ?

इसलिए कठोर शब्दों के बावजूद भी श्री तिवा री के विचारों पर चर्चा आवश्यक है .

Karl Marx, founder of the Marxist cult, had declared religion to be an opium of the masses capable of intoxicating people into articificial / superficial joy ! What does Marxist cult do ? Anything other than poisoning and destroying the masses ? So, which is better of the two ?

First activity that Marxist undertakes is destroy entire cultural heritage and somehow convert everyone into empty-headed zombies, to create space in their minds so as to allow the venomous doctrine of Marxism to establish itself in their minds. And these Marxist-Jehadis would go to any extent to wreak destruction. Their limit is no limit at all. Post 1947, these enemies of the nation have caused havoc to the education system of the country. With the bogey of so-called saffronisation, these foes forced removal of all chapters from school text-books that related to freedom movement, cultural values, rich heritage, traditions etc. Consequences are there for all to to see today in the form of social tensions, rising crime-graph, all sorts of social problems etc. Not very long ago in China, Chinese workers used to be entertained through recitation-reading of Mao’s Red Book during lunch-breaks !! Frank Dikotter in his recently published book titled THE TRAGEDY OF LIBERATION writes that about 70 million people were killed in China by the end of Mao’s regime and policies, surpassing both Hitler and Stalin in terms of death and destruction. terror was an integral part of entire Maoism. Teams were given quotas of people who had to be denounced, humiliated, beaten, dispossessed and then slaughtered. Jung Chang and Jon Halliday wrote in their book titled MAO : THE UNKNOWN STORY that Mao was a man who actually detested peasants. When peasants were starving in 1950, Mao instructed them to eat less and less…the so-called revolutionary had some 50 villas across China for his protection and comforts. Mao would have been certainly disappointed by the miniscule number of innocents being killed by the leftists in the country. Tales of torture and depravity keep appearing in media from North Korea. In so far as man-slaughter regime of Russian dictator Marshall Joseph Stalin is concerned, less said the better.

During sixties, they deliberately ruined the national economy through their stooges in bodies like Planning Commission, then coined the ludicrous phrase HINDU RATE OF GROWTH !! As if ridiculing themselves !! By the way, is there a single Marxist economy that has been able to raise a nation from the state of wretchedness to the state of being developing / developed nation ? Certainly, NONE.

They derisively coined the phrase COW-BELT completely disregarding cow / cattle based agriculture that is self-sustaining and cancer-free, that allowed this country remain prosperous, which is nothing but betraying their sick minds.

No wonder, they provided all the so-called intellectual arguments to MA Jinnah to justify vivisection of the country.

They hate religion, particularly (probably because Hinduism is the oldest and imperishable faith) yet create a theocratic state wherever they are able to grab power by hook or crook. And they nourish the theocratic state mercilessly and brutally, too.

When Hinduism began resurgence during nineties, these smart Marxist-Johnnies changed track immediately to avoid a suicidal end of the cult and began stressing virtues of a secular / submissive Hinduism, separated it from the assertive Hinduism demanding recall of it’s glory trampled hitherto, by the invaders / invading ideologies. By intention and by design, they overlooked intolerance and exclusivism of Semitic religions like Islam, Judaism and Christianity. They ignored the empire building agenda of desert religions like Islam and Christianity as well as the lofty spirit of VASUDHAIVA KUTUMBAKUM  prevailing among Hindus. It shall not be impertinent to quote Encyclopaedia Brittannica (as they would not believe Veda-s if quoted !!) : “In principle, Hinduism incorporates all forms of belief and worship without necessitating selection or elimination of any. Hindu is inclined to revere the divine in every manifestation, whatever it may be, is doctrinally tolerant…Hindu may embrace a non-Hindu religion without ceasing to be a Hindu…he tends to believe that highest divine powers complement one another for the well-being of the world and mankind.”  And Marxists floated the theory that Buddism / Jainism / Sikhism are separate faiths, independent of Hinduism !!

The venomous cult of Marxism has evolved into cults of Maoism / Naxalism, still more terror oriented, that too of the brutal variety.

Anti-national Marxists peddle Maoism / Naxalism sometimes as an agrarian movement without even knowing what an agrarian movement means. They must follow agrarian movements unleashed by worthies like Vinoba Bhave / JP / Charan Singh or even Jagjivan Ram to understand how an effective agrarian movement can be worked out without resorting to AK-47, landmines, granades etc. They never abducted District Magistrates to drive home their agrarian ideology.

If the entire bloodbath is all about lack of rural development, it is a horrible argument to say the least. Why are they non-receptive to almost 20 years of rural development programmes in the hinterland ? Why do they kidnap a government official known for his orientation for rural development and excellent performance ? Why do they kidnap a tribal MLA who wins with a margin of 92,000 votes deep in tribal regions ? Why do they landmine / granade-attack government officials entering into tribal areas to implement rural development schemes ? Then they disrupt electoral process, stop voters from casting their votes, bomb school buildings, scare away those who want to study, kidnap tour-operators who are a source of income for the deprived ones for whom no bells toll…why do they destroy infrastructure in interiors that spurs economic growth ? Why do they lobby with international bodies to scuttle development projects like Narmada Valley project ?

And there are leftist sponsored activists who poke their nose in every developmental activity with the sole intention to sabotage progress of the nation. The way they appear from nowhere like locusts is truly amazing.

If Marxists / Maoists / Naxalites really believe in development, how and why is that Bengal became a wretched state in 34 years of uninterrupted CPM rule ? Just 15 years were enough for war-ravaged Japan / Germany to rise like Phoenix from the dust while Bengal conceded them 34 years in a single go, uninterrupted ! Whom would they like to blame for the ills of Bengal ? How is that they failed miserably in Nepal too ?

As a matter of fact, they are anti-nationals,  who should be dealt with, with the severity they deserve. It’s NO IDEOLOGY AT ALL.

Though slander backfires and is best avoided in articles like this , but they must know that many people consider  their ideology as  idiotology of Marxism may be called MURDEROLOGY / DESTRUCTOLOGY/ Plunderology.