Feb 26 at 6:40 PM
2ND PARTITION OF INDIA
Considering the reactions of a section of Muslims and Muslim leadership in Mumbai, Pune, Bengaluru, Hyderabad, Lucknow and Allahabad to the happenings in Assam, we must assume that as in 1947, the next partition would also be on religious lines because of the noble concept of secularism in India becoming increasingly perverse. Unless somebody like Narendra Modi became the Prime Minister, India would witness another partition sooner rather than later. The prospect of another partition of the country is something that has been talked about in political circles and middle class homes over the last few years. We have often argued that the so-called secular politicians and analysts( dominating our intelligentsia and media) are among the most communal-minded persons in the country, given their uncritical and unthinking support to self proclaimed Muslim politicians and religious leaders. They have not bothered to find out whether these self-proclaimed leaders are the genuine representatives of our Muslim . In fact, most of our “secularists” have not learnt anything from the way the country was partitioned in 1947.In the name of secularism, Gandhiji and the Congress encouraged Muslim separatism in the country. If today Muslims are being misguided by some of their leaders over what is happening to Bangladeshi Muslims in Myanmar, it is in line with what happened during the Khilafat movement (1918-21). That time, Gandhiji supported the pan-Islamic campaign launched by Indian Muslim leaders to influence the British government and to protect the Ottoman Empire whereas in the Turkey itself Mustafa Kemal Pasha, the legendary Turkish leader, was planning how to secularise and modernise Turkey as a Republic. In fact, the more Gandhi and the Congress appeased the then Muslim leadership, the more stubborn they became in their separatist outlook. Some of so called Moslem leaders are provoking moslem to develop separatist outlooks and in this these leaders are being supported by our “secular leaders” in the mainstream political parties. In fact, point need to add that some of the newly created institutions like the National Minority Commission (NMC) are aggravating the crisis by adding fuel to the fire lit by the “secular” leaders. See their blatantly partisan report on the recent riots in Assam, something many reputed human rights organisations have dubbed as rubbish. It is a valid question … whether in a secular country like India, which has a National Human Rights Commission and a separate ministry called Minority affairs, there should be a at all some thing called National Minority Commission (NMC) . The NMC has not played any meaningful role other than promoting and legitimising separatist outlooks among our citizens, such as demanding reservations and minority-specific laws that weaken the very spirit of our democratic constitution. Had it not been so, one would not have come across the recent statement of Azam Khan, the number two in the cabinet of Akhilesh Yadav in Uttar Pradesh that time has come to give Indian Muslims reservations in jobs and legislatures in proportion to their actual number, which is about 15 per cent of India’s total population. It may be noted that most of the radical leaders among the Muslims believe in Wahabism that talks of the absolute supremacy of Islam over all other religions. The vote-bank politics in recent years has become so pervasive that our politicians and intelligentsia are totally defensive and often apologetic to the champions of the xenophobic Wahabism that is dividing the Indians. Interestingly, “secularism” has been never defined by its champions in India. Though the 42nd Amendment in 1975 by Indira Gandhi’s Congress Government did incorporate the word “secularism” in our Constitution, it did not define what secularism was. Ironically, her Congress party, which dominated the then Rajya Sabha in 1978, foiled an attempt to actually define secularism as “equal respect to all religions” by defeating an amendment-Bill that had already been cleared in the Lok Sabha during the Janata regime of Morarji Desai.Thus, in the absence of a clear definition of secularism in our political parlance, we will continue to witness “communal politicians” becoming “secular” overnight and vice versa, with everything depending on the political convenience of the parties and their supporters. Those who love this country must act now .. They must defeat all Secularist Political Party other wise those Secularist will break India just to prove they are ASSHOLE … People who are novice in politics like Mr Krjriwal will act as fuel to Fire in this Poltical downfall .. As every one want to win the Power and every one love to use easiest process to gather vote Secularism will become main agenda in Isalmization process
https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=10200644774761514&set=gm.286152088208938&type=1&theater
Considering the reactions of a section of Muslims and Muslim leadership in Mumbai, Pune, Bengaluru, Hyderabad, Lucknow and Allahabad to the happenings in Assam, we must assume that as in 1947, the next partition would also be on religious lines because of the noble concept of secularism in India becoming increasingly perverse. Unless somebody like Narendra Modi became the Prime Minister, India would witness another partition sooner rather than later. The prospect of another partition of the country is something that has been talked about in political circles and middle class homes over the last few years. We have often argued that the so-called secular politicians and analysts( dominating our intelligentsia and media) are among the most communal-minded persons in the country, given their uncritical and unthinking support to self proclaimed Muslim politicians and religious leaders. They have not bothered to find out whether these self-proclaimed leaders are the genuine representatives of our Muslim . In fact, most of our “secularists” have not learnt anything from the way the country was partitioned in 1947.In the name of secularism, Gandhiji and the Congress encouraged Muslim separatism in the country. If today Muslims are being misguided by some of their leaders over what is happening to Bangladeshi Muslims in Myanmar, it is in line with what happened during the Khilafat movement (1918-21). That time, Gandhiji supported the pan-Islamic campaign launched by Indian Muslim leaders to influence the British government and to protect the Ottoman Empire whereas in the Turkey itself Mustafa Kemal Pasha, the legendary Turkish leader, was planning how to secularise and modernise Turkey as a Republic. In fact, the more Gandhi and the Congress appeased the then Muslim leadership, the more stubborn they became in their separatist outlook. Some of so called Moslem leaders are provoking moslem to develop separatist outlooks and in this these leaders are being supported by our “secular leaders” in the mainstream political parties. In fact, point need to add that some of the newly created institutions like the National Minority Commission (NMC) are aggravating the crisis by adding fuel to the fire lit by the “secular” leaders. See their blatantly partisan report on the recent riots in Assam, something many reputed human rights organisations have dubbed as rubbish. It is a valid question … whether in a secular country like India, which has a National Human Rights Commission and a separate ministry called Minority affairs, there should be a at all some thing called National Minority Commission (NMC) . The NMC has not played any meaningful role other than promoting and legitimising separatist outlooks among our citizens, such as demanding reservations and minority-specific laws that weaken the very spirit of our democratic constitution. Had it not been so, one would not have come across the recent statement of Azam Khan, the number two in the cabinet of Akhilesh Yadav in Uttar Pradesh that time has come to give Indian Muslims reservations in jobs and legislatures in proportion to their actual number, which is about 15 per cent of India’s total population. It may be noted that most of the radical leaders among the Muslims believe in Wahabism that talks of the absolute supremacy of Islam over all other religions. The vote-bank politics in recent years has become so pervasive that our politicians and intelligentsia are totally defensive and often apologetic to the champions of the xenophobic Wahabism that is dividing the Indians. Interestingly, “secularism” has been never defined by its champions in India. Though the 42nd Amendment in 1975 by Indira Gandhi’s Congress Government did incorporate the word “secularism” in our Constitution, it did not define what secularism was. Ironically, her Congress party, which dominated the then Rajya Sabha in 1978, foiled an attempt to actually define secularism as “equal respect to all religions” by defeating an amendment-Bill that had already been cleared in the Lok Sabha during the Janata regime of Morarji Desai.Thus, in the absence of a clear definition of secularism in our political parlance, we will continue to witness “communal politicians” becoming “secular” overnight and vice versa, with everything depending on the political convenience of the parties and their supporters. Those who love this country must act now .. They must defeat all Secularist Political Party other wise those Secularist will break India just to prove they are ASSHOLE … People who are novice in politics like Mr Krjriwal will act as fuel to Fire in this Poltical downfall .. As every one want to win the Power and every one love to use easiest process to gather vote Secularism will become main agenda in Isalmization process
https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=10200644774761514&set=gm.286152088208938&type=1&theater
2ND PARTITION OF INDIA
Considering the reactions of a section of Muslims and Muslim leadership in Mumbai, Pune, Bengaluru, Hyderabad, Lucknow and Allahabad to the happenings in Assam, we must assume that as in 1947, the next partition would also be on religious lines because of the noble concept of secularism in India becoming increasingly perverse. Unless somebody like Narendra Modi became the Prime Minister, India would witness another partition sooner rather than later. The prospect of another partition of the country is something that has been talked about in political circles and middle class homes over the last few years. We have often argued that the so-called secular politicians and analysts( dominating our intelligentsia and media) are among the most communal-minded persons in the country, given their uncritical and unthinking support to self proclaimed Muslim politicians and religious leaders. They have not bothered to find out whether these self-proclaimed leaders are the genuine representatives of our Muslim . In fact, most of our “secularists” have not learnt anything from the way the country was partitioned in 1947.In the name of secularism, Gandhiji and the Congress encouraged Muslim separatism in the country. If today Muslims are being misguided by some of their leaders over what is happening to Bangladeshi Muslims in Myanmar, it is in line with what happened during the Khilafat movement (1918-21). That time, Gandhiji supported the pan-Islamic campaign launched by Indian Muslim leaders to influence the British government and to protect the Ottoman Empire whereas in the Turkey itself Mustafa Kemal Pasha, the legendary Turkish leader, was planning how to secularise and modernise Turkey as a Republic. In fact, the more Gandhi and the Congress appeased the then Muslim leadership, the more stubborn they became in their separatist outlook. Some of so called Moslem leaders are provoking moslem to develop separatist outlooks and in this these leaders are being supported by our “secular leaders” in the mainstream political parties. In fact, point need to add that some of the newly created institutions like the National Minority Commission (NMC) are aggravating the crisis by adding fuel to the fire lit by the “secular” leaders. See their blatantly partisan report on the recent riots in Assam, something many reputed human rights organisations have dubbed as rubbish. It is a valid question … whether in a secular country like India, which has a National Human Rights Commission and a separate ministry called Minority affairs, there should be a at all some thing called National Minority Commission (NMC) . The NMC has not played any meaningful role other than promoting and legitimising separatist outlooks among our citizens, such as demanding reservations and minority-specific laws that weaken the very spirit of our democratic constitution. Had it not been so, one would not have come across the recent statement of Azam Khan, the number two in the cabinet of Akhilesh Yadav in Uttar Pradesh that time has come to give Indian Muslims reservations in jobs and legislatures in proportion to their actual number, which is about 15 per cent of India’s total population. It may be noted that most of the radical leaders among the Muslims believe in Wahabism that talks of the absolute supremacy of Islam over all other religions. The vote-bank politics in recent years has become so pervasive that our politicians and intelligentsia are totally defensive and often apologetic to the champions of the xenophobic Wahabism that is dividing the Indians. Interestingly, “secularism” has been never defined by its champions in India. Though the 42nd Amendment in 1975 by Indira Gandhi’s Congress Government did incorporate the word “secularism” in our Constitution, it did not define what secularism was. Ironically, her Congress party, which dominated the then Rajya Sabha in 1978, foiled an attempt to actually define secularism as “equal respect to all religions” by defeating an amendment-Bill that had already been cleared in the Lok Sabha during the Janata regime of Morarji Desai.Thus, in the absence of a clear definition of secularism in our political parlance, we will continue to witness “communal politicians” becoming “secular” overnight and vice versa, with everything depending on the political convenience of the parties and their supporters. Those who love this country must act now .. They must defeat all Secularist Political Party other wise those Secularist will break India just to prove they are ASSHOLE … People who are novice in politics like Mr Krjriwal will act as fuel to Fire in this Poltical downfall .. As every one want to win the Power and every one love to use easiest process to gather vote Secularism will become main agenda in Isalmization process
Considering the reactions of a section of Muslims and Muslim leadership in Mumbai, Pune, Bengaluru, Hyderabad, Lucknow and Allahabad to the happenings in Assam, we must assume that as in 1947, the next partition would also be on religious lines because of the noble concept of secularism in India becoming increasingly perverse. Unless somebody like Narendra Modi became the Prime Minister, India would witness another partition sooner rather than later. The prospect of another partition of the country is something that has been talked about in political circles and middle class homes over the last few years. We have often argued that the so-called secular politicians and analysts( dominating our intelligentsia and media) are among the most communal-minded persons in the country, given their uncritical and unthinking support to self proclaimed Muslim politicians and religious leaders. They have not bothered to find out whether these self-proclaimed leaders are the genuine representatives of our Muslim . In fact, most of our “secularists” have not learnt anything from the way the country was partitioned in 1947.In the name of secularism, Gandhiji and the Congress encouraged Muslim separatism in the country. If today Muslims are being misguided by some of their leaders over what is happening to Bangladeshi Muslims in Myanmar, it is in line with what happened during the Khilafat movement (1918-21). That time, Gandhiji supported the pan-Islamic campaign launched by Indian Muslim leaders to influence the British government and to protect the Ottoman Empire whereas in the Turkey itself Mustafa Kemal Pasha, the legendary Turkish leader, was planning how to secularise and modernise Turkey as a Republic. In fact, the more Gandhi and the Congress appeased the then Muslim leadership, the more stubborn they became in their separatist outlook. Some of so called Moslem leaders are provoking moslem to develop separatist outlooks and in this these leaders are being supported by our “secular leaders” in the mainstream political parties. In fact, point need to add that some of the newly created institutions like the National Minority Commission (NMC) are aggravating the crisis by adding fuel to the fire lit by the “secular” leaders. See their blatantly partisan report on the recent riots in Assam, something many reputed human rights organisations have dubbed as rubbish. It is a valid question … whether in a secular country like India, which has a National Human Rights Commission and a separate ministry called Minority affairs, there should be a at all some thing called National Minority Commission (NMC) . The NMC has not played any meaningful role other than promoting and legitimising separatist outlooks among our citizens, such as demanding reservations and minority-specific laws that weaken the very spirit of our democratic constitution. Had it not been so, one would not have come across the recent statement of Azam Khan, the number two in the cabinet of Akhilesh Yadav in Uttar Pradesh that time has come to give Indian Muslims reservations in jobs and legislatures in proportion to their actual number, which is about 15 per cent of India’s total population. It may be noted that most of the radical leaders among the Muslims believe in Wahabism that talks of the absolute supremacy of Islam over all other religions. The vote-bank politics in recent years has become so pervasive that our politicians and intelligentsia are totally defensive and often apologetic to the champions of the xenophobic Wahabism that is dividing the Indians. Interestingly, “secularism” has been never defined by its champions in India. Though the 42nd Amendment in 1975 by Indira Gandhi’s Congress Government did incorporate the word “secularism” in our Constitution, it did not define what secularism was. Ironically, her Congress party, which dominated the then Rajya Sabha in 1978, foiled an attempt to actually define secularism as “equal respect to all religions” by defeating an amendment-Bill that had already been cleared in the Lok Sabha during the Janata regime of Morarji Desai.Thus, in the absence of a clear definition of secularism in our political parlance, we will continue to witness “communal politicians” becoming “secular” overnight and vice versa, with everything depending on the political convenience of the parties and their supporters. Those who love this country must act now .. They must defeat all Secularist Political Party other wise those Secularist will break India just to prove they are ASSHOLE … People who are novice in politics like Mr Krjriwal will act as fuel to Fire in this Poltical downfall .. As every one want to win the Power and every one love to use easiest process to gather vote Secularism will become main agenda in Isalmization process
Shubhamastu Sachin Gupta
